<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Thoughts on Thanos Apollo</title>
    <link>https://thanosapollo.org/tags/thoughts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Thoughts on Thanos Apollo</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://thanosapollo.org/tags/thoughts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why we need more .org sites.</title>
      <link>https://thanosapollo.org/posts/more-org-sites/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://thanosapollo.org/posts/more-org-sites/</guid>
      <description>Why change the site extension to .org from .com</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&rsquo;s web needs more .org sites. I&rsquo;m changing this site&rsquo;s extension
to thanosapollo.org from .com.</p>
<h2 id="about">About</h2>
<p>I&rsquo;ve first registered this site using <code>thanosapollo.com</code>, <code>.com</code> is
the <em>default</em> when it comes to today&rsquo;s websites, roughly 50% of
websites use it and that&rsquo;s what most users are familiar with.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><code>.com</code> stands for commercial/for profit, although it&rsquo;s sometimes
also used by blogs and nonprofit sites to capture more visitors. On
the other hand, <code>.org</code> is associated with nonprofit organizations,
or that generally provide free information and resources.</p>
</blockquote>
<!--quoteend-->
<blockquote>
<p>The context of this post refers to <code>.org</code> not just as a top level
domain, but as a freely accessible FOSS site.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2 id="why-switch-to-.org-and-why-we-need-more-.org-sites">Why switch to .org and why we need more .org sites</h2>
<p>I&rsquo;m not planning to use this site for any kind of commercial/for
profit purpose, having a <code>.org</code> extension implies that this site purpose
is non-commercial. Even though it&rsquo;s less popular, I find that today&rsquo;s
web landscape needs more <code>.org</code> sites and less <code>.com</code>.</p>
<p>About ~10 years ago, <em>when I was 13 years old</em>, the web seemed to be a
sanctuary of freely available information. 10 years later, even
useless information is behind a javascript pay-wall or login portal.
The web&rsquo;s increased traffic has been followed with lesser valuable
content creation, with today&rsquo;s users being accustomed to using the
&lsquo;web&rsquo; only through mobile social media apps, making them tied to a
proprietary ecosystem where they don&rsquo;t even own their profiles on said
platforms, their webmaster does.</p>
<p>We need more sites that offer free information for all and less people
behind proprietary platforms. I hope in the future we have more people
actually owning the sites they share their content. They might make
blogs or whatever else they like, as long as less of them end up at
the mercy of big tech <code>.com</code> companies.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Even if you are after creating only for-profit content, making your
business depend entirely on a 3rd party is not the brightest idea.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2 id="difficulties-of-changing-my-site-to-.org">Difficulties of changing my site to .org</h2>
<p>The only issue with changing my site&rsquo;s extension was updating my
project&rsquo;s git remotes &amp; package recipes as well email services to the
new domain name. Although this is more of an inconvenience rather
than an actual difficulty.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
